npx agentspec-cli install 3b748b6b-5413-4b01-bc45-93386608bc40 --framework ClaudeCode→ .claude/skills/orchv2/SKILL.md
# OrchV2 - Context-Aware Agentic Orchestrator
This skill is the **meta-orchestrator** that intelligently routes product launches through optimal execution paths based on business context detection.
## When to Use
Invoke this skill when:
- User says: "create a campaign plan", "what's the best approach", "recommend marketing strategy"
- User provides product details and asks for execution guidance
- User needs budget-optimized scenario recommendations
- User asks: "what will this cost?", "how long will this take?", "what do I need?"
- Beginning any multi-skill orchestration workflow
- Any skill needs to query execution context (recursive invocation)
## When NOT to Use
- User already knows exact skills to run (use direct skill invocation)
- Single-skill execution tasks
- User wants to manually control every step without recommendations
---
## What OrchV2 Does
### 1. Analyzes Product Context
Detects **6 business dimensions**:
- **Budget Tier**: bootstrapped (<$5K), lean ($5-20K), standard ($20-100K), premium (>$100K)
- **Launch Channel**: Kickstarter, Indiegogo, DTC, SaaS, Enterprise
- **Brand Maturity**: pre-launch, launch-ready, growth, established
- **Timeline Urgency**: rushed (<2wks), standard (2-8wks), thorough (>8wks)
- **Team Size**: solo (1 person), small (2-5), agency (>5)
- **Content Depth**: minimal, standard, maximum
### 2. Recommends Scenarios
Generates ranked list of **6 pre-built scenarios**:
1. 🏗️ **Brand Genesis** - Foundation-building ($4K, 1-2 days, 8 skills)
2. 🎯 **Crowdfunding Lean** - Budget Kickstarter ($12.5K, 2-3 days, 12 skills)
3. 🚀 **Crowdfunding Full** - Premium campaign ($28K, 4-5 days, 20 skills)
4. 🛒 **Bootstrapped DTC** - Organic launch ($8K, 1-2 days, 9 skills)
5. 🏢 **Enterprise GTM** - B2B SaaS ($45K, 5-7 days, 12 skills)
6. ⚙️ **Custom Hybrid** - Pick & choose with smart recommendations
### 3. Generates Execution Plans
For selected scenario:
- Ordered list of skills to execute
- Cost estimates (tokens + USD)
- Timeline projections (days)
- Deliverables breakdown (included/excluded)
- Platform-specific constraints
### 4. Optimizes for Budget
- Substitutes lean variants when over-budget
- Recommends upgrades when under-budget
- Explains cost-benefit tradeoffs
- Shows ROI estimates
---
## Input Variables
### Required
- `[PRODUCT]` - One of:
- Path to `product.md` file
- Inline product description with brand name, category, description, audience
### Optional (Auto-Detected)
- `[BUDGET_AMOUNT]` - USD budget available
- `[LAUNCH_CHANNEL]` - kickstarter|indiegogo|dtc|saas|enterprise
- `[TIMELINE_WEEKS]` - Weeks until launch
- `[TEAM_COUNT]` - Number of people on team
- `[STAGE]` - pre-launch|launch-ready|growth|established
### Output Preferences
- `[OUTPUT_FORMAT]` - recommendations|plan|comparison (default: recommendations)
- `[SCENARIO_ID]` - Specific scenario to use (optional, auto-recommends if missing)
- `[LIMIT]` - Number of scenarios to return (default: 3)
---
## The Protocol (4 Phases)
### Phase 1: Context Detection (Steps 1-3)
**Step 1: Parse Product Input**
- Extract: brand name, category, positioning
- Identify product type: hardware, digital, service, physical goods
- Parse specifications if provided
- Extract target audience segments
**Step 2: Detect Launch Context** (if not explicit)
Budget Tier Detection:
```
IF budget_amount provided:
< $5K → bootstrapped
$5-20K → lean
$20-100K → standard
> $100K → premium
ELSE IF product_price available:
< $50 → bootstrapped
$50-200 → lean
$200-500 → standard
> $500 → premium
ELSE IF team_count available:
1 person → bootstrapped
2-5 people → lean/standard
> 5 people → premium
ELSE:
default: standard
```
Channel Detection:
```
Scan for keywords in category/messaging:
"kickstarter", "crowdfunding", "backer" → kickstarter
"indiegogo" → indiegogo
"shopify", "dtc", "ecommerce" → dtc
"saas", "subscription", "platform" → saas
"enterprise", "b2b" → enterprise
IF hardware/wearable/gadget:
default: kickstarter
ELSE IF software/app:
default: saas
ELSE:
default: dtc
```
Maturity Detection:
```
IF has_existing_brand=false AND has_existing_content=false:
→ pre-launch
ELSE IF has_existing_brand=true AND has_existing_content=false:
→ launch-ready
ELSE IF has_existing_brand=true AND has_existing_content=true:
IF target_regions > 2:
→ established
ELSE:
→ growth
```
Timeline Detection:
```
IF timeline_weeks < 2:
→ rushed
ELSE IF timeline_weeks <= 8:
→ standard
ELSE:
→ thorough
Fallback from budget:
bootstrapped → rushed
premium → thorough
else → standard
```
Team Size Detection:
```
IF team_count = 1:
→ solo
ELSE IF team_count <= 5:
→ small
ELSE:
→ agency
Fallback from budget:
bootstrapped → solo
premium → agency
else → small
```
**Step 3: Explain Detection Logic**
For each dimension, state:
- Detected value
- Reasoning (which heuristic triggered)
- Confidence level: high (explicit data), medium (inferred), low (default)
**Validation Gate 1:**
- All 6 dimensions must have a value (even if default)
- Flag any low-confidence detections
- Suggest user confirm if >2 dimensions are low-confidence
---
### Phase 2: Scenario Matching (Steps 4-6)
**Step 4: Score All Scenarios** (0-100% match)
Scoring Algorithm:
```
match_score = 0
# Budget alignment (50% weight)
IF budget_tier == scenario.best_for_budget:
match_score += 50
ELSE IF abs(budget_tier_index - scenario_budget_index) == 1:
match_score += 25 # Adjacent tier
ELSE:
match_score += 0
# Channel alignment (30% weight)
IF channel IN scenario.best_for_channels:
match_score += 30
ELSE IF scenario.best_for_channels is empty:
match_score += 15 # Universal scenario
ELSE:
match_score += 0
# Maturity alignment (20% weight)
IF maturity IN scenario.best_for_maturity:
match_score += 20
ELSE IF scenario.best_for_maturity is empty:
match_score += 10 # Universal scenario
ELSE:
match_score += 0
# Return final score (0-100)
```
**Step 5: Generate Pros/Cons** for each scenario
Pros Logic:
```
IF match_score >= 80:
+ "Perfect match for your context"
IF budget matches:
+ "Budget aligned ($X,XXX)"
IF channel matches:
+ "Optimized for {channel}"
IF timeline fits:
+ "Timeline matches urgency ({timeline})"
IF features comprehensive:
+ "Complete asset package"
```
Cons Logic:
```
IF budget over:
- "Would exceed budget by ${over_amount}"
IF budget under significantly:
- "Under-utilizes budget (room for upgrades)"
IF wrong channel:
- "Better suited for {other_channels}"
IF assumes assets user doesn't have:
- "Assumes existing {missing_asset}"
IF excludes desired features:
- "Excludes {feature}"
```
**Step 6: Rank by Score** (descending)
- Sort scenarios by match_score
- Take top N (default 3)
- Mark highest score as "RECOMMENDED"
**Validation Gate 2:**
- At least 1 scenario must score >50%
- If no good match, recommend "custom-hybrid" with explanation
- If top 3 scores are very close (<10% apart), flag as "multiple good options"
---
### Phase 3: Cost Estimation (Steps 7-8)
**Step 7: Calculate Costs for Top Scenarios**
For each scenario:
```python
total_tokens = 0
total_usd = 0
skill_breakdown = []
FOR each skill_id IN scenario.skill_ids:
skill = registry.get_skill(skill_id)
# Base token estimate
base_tokens = skill.metadata.estimated_tokens
# Apply depth multiplier
depth_multipliers = {
"surface": 0.5,
"focused": 1.0,
"comprehensive": 1.5,
"exhaustive": 2.5
}
depth_mult = depth_multipliers[scenario.execution_context.depth_level]
# Apply format overhead
format_overhead = {
"minimal": 500,
"standard": 1500,
"maximum": 3000
}
format_add = format_overhead[scenario.execution_context.output_format]
# Calculate
skill_tokens = int(base_tokens * depth_mult + format_add)
skill_usd = int(skill_tokens * 0.25) # $0.25 per 1K tokens
total_tokens += skill_tokens
total_usd += skill_usd
skill_breakdown.append({
"skill_id": skill_id,
"skill_name": skill.name,
"tokens": skill_tokens,
"usd": skill_usd
})
scenario.estimated_tokens = total_tokens
scenario.estimated_cost_usd = total_usd
scenario.cost_breakdown = skill_breakdown
```
**Step 8: Calculate Budget Utilization**
```
IF user_budget_amount provided:
utilization = (estimated_cost / user_budget_amount) * 100
IF utilization > 100:
warning = f"Over budget by {utilization - 100}%"
ELSE IF utilization < 70:
suggestion = f"Under budget by {100 - utilization}%. Consider upgrades."
ELSE:
status = f"Good fit ({utilization}% of budget)"
```
**Validation Gate 3:**
- Per-skill cost should be 1K-15K tokens (flag if outside)
- Total cost should align with scenario.estimated_cost_usd ±20%
- Budget utilization should be reasonable (50-120%)
---
### Phase 4: Output Generation (Steps 9-12)
**Step 9: Generate Recommendations Output** (if output_format = "recommendations")
Structure:
```markdown
# Scenario Recommendations
## Detected Context
| Dimension | Value | Reasoning |
|-----------|-------|-----------|
| Budget | lean | Explicit budget $15K |
| Channel | kickstarter | Keywords + hardware category |
| ... | ... | ... |
## Recommended Scenarios
### #1 - 🎯 Crowdfunding Lean ← RECOMMENDED
**Match Score:** 85%
**Description:** {scenario.description}
**Estimates:** 12 skills | $12,500 | 2-3 days
**Pros:**
- Perfect budget match
- Optimized for Kickstarter
**Cons:**
- Assumes existing brand identity
**Deliverables:** Campaign page, video script, ads, emails...
### #2 - ... (repeat for top 3)
## Next Steps
1. Review recommendations
2. Select scenario
3. Run: `python3 -m orchv2.cli.main plan --scenario <id>`
```
**Step 10: Generate Execution Plan** (if output_format = "plan")
Structure:
```markdown
# Execution Plan: Crowdfunding Lean
## Scenario Overview
{Description, estimates, context}
## Execution Context
| Constraint | Value |
|------------|-------|
| Budget Tier | lean |
| Tone | conversion-focused, urgent |
| Depth | focused |
| ...
## Skills to Execute
1. Buyer Persona
- Tokens: 5,000 | Cost: $1,250 | Time: ~8 min
- Dependencies: None
- Outputs: persona_name, voice_samples, emotional_drivers
2. Competitor Analysis
- Tokens: 6,000 | Cost: $1,500 | Time: ~10 min
- Dependencies: None
- Outputs: market_gaps, verified_anxieties
... (repeat for all 12 skills)
## Cost Breakdown
| Skill | Tokens | USD |
|-------|--------|-----|
| Buyer Persona | 5,000 | $1,250 |
| ... | ... | ... |
| **TOTAL** | **50,000** | **$12,500** |
## How to Execute
```bash
python3 -m orchv2.cli.main run --scenario crowdfunding-lean
```
```
**Step 11: Generate Comparison Table** (if output_format = "comparison")
Structure:
```markdown
# Scenario Comparison
## Side-by-Side
| Metric | Crowdfund Lean | Crowdfund Full | Bootstrap DTC |
|--------|---------------|----------------|---------------|
| Skills | 12 | 20 | 9 |
| Cost | $12,500 | $28,000 | $8,000 |
| Timeline | 2-3 days | 4-5 days | 1-2 days |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Deliverables Matrix
| Deliverable | Lean | Full | DTC |
|-------------|------|------|-----|
| Campaign Page | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Video Script | ⚡ | ✅ | ❌ |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
Legend: ✅ Full | ⚡ Lean | ❌ Not included
## Recommendation: Crowdfunding Lean (85% match)
{Reasoning}
```
**Step 12: Generate JSON Metadata Block**
All outputs must include:
```json
{
"meta": {
"orchestrator_version": "2.0.0",
"product_name": "...",
"detected_context": {
"budget_tier": "lean",
"launch_channel": "kickstarter",
"maturity_stage": "pre-launch",
"timeline_urgency": "standard",
"team_size": "small"
},
"generated_at": "2026-01-20T18:30:00Z"
},
"recommendations": [
{
"rank": 1,
"scenario_id": "crowdfunding-lean",
"match_score": 0.85,
"estimated_cost_usd": 12500,
"estimated_tokens": 50000,
"timeline_days": "2-3",
"skills": ["buyer-persona", "competitor-analysis", ...]
},
// ... top 3 scenarios
]
}
```
**Validation Gate 4:**
- Output includes all required sections
- JSON is valid and complete
- Cost estimates are present
- Reasoning is clear and actionable
---
## Output Templates
Generate output using one of three templates:
1. **recommendations.md** - Top 3 scenarios with match scores, pros/cons
2. **execution-plan.md** - Detailed plan for selected scenario with cost breakdown
3. **scenario-comparison.md** - Side-by-side table of multiple scenarios
(See `templates/` directory for full templates)
---
## Self-Reference Pattern
OrchV2 can be invoked recursively for context queries:
**Example: Campaign Copy Skill Queries OrchV2**
```
Step 1: campaign-page-copy skill starts execution
Step 2: Skill needs to know: "Am I in lean or premium mode?"
Step 3: Skill invokes: query_orchv2("execution_context")
Step 4: OrchV2 returns:
{
"budget_tier": "lean",
"tone": "conversion-focused, urgent",
"depth_level": "focused",
"output_format": "standard",
"token_limit": 5000
}
Step 5: Skill adapts output accordingly
```
**Context Queries Supported:**
- `execution_context` - Returns ExecutionContext object
- `am_i_over_budget(tokens_used)` - Returns boolean + remaining budget
- `what_scenario` - Returns current scenario_id
- `what_quality_bar` - Returns quality_bar setting
- `platform_constraints` - Returns list of platform-specific rules
This creates a **context-aware agent mesh** where any skill can query the orchestrator.
---
## Quality Guardrails
1. **Always explain detection** - Don't just say "lean budget", explain WHY
2. **Surface uncertainty** - Flag low-confidence detections with ⚠️
3. **Provide alternatives** - Show top 3, not just #1
4. **Explain tradeoffs** - Clear pros/cons for each
5. **Cost transparency** - Always show estimates
6. **Validate assumptions** - Ask user to confirm if confidence <medium
---
## Error Handling
| Condition | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Product data missing | Ask for minimum: brand name + category |
| Context undetectable | Use defaults + flag low confidence |
| No scenario >50% match | Recommend custom-hybrid + explain why |
| Budget too low | Suggest brand-genesis-lean OR increasing budget |
| Skills registry empty | Fallback to V1 orchestrator skill list |
---
## CLI Invocation
```bash
# Context analysis
python3 -m orchv2.cli.main analyze-context --product product.md
# Get recommendations
python3 -m orchv2.cli.main recommend --limit 3
# Generate plan
python3 -m orchv2.cli.main plan --scenario crowdfunding-lean
# Compare scenarios
python3 -m orchv2.cli.main compare --scenarios crowdfunding-lean,crowdfunding-full
```
---
## Python API
```python
from orchv2 import ContextAnalyzer, ScenarioRecommender, SkillsRegistry
# Load product
product = load_product("product.md")
# Analyze context
analyzer = ContextAnalyzer()
context = analyzer.analyze(product)
# Get recommendations
recommender = ScenarioRecommender()
matches = recommender.recommend(product, context, limit=3)
# Generate plan
scenario = recommender.get_scenario(matches[0].scenario_id)
registry = SkillsRegistry()
cost = registry.estimate_total_cost(scenario.skill_ids)
print(f"Recommended: {scenario.name}")
print(f"Cost: ${cost['total_usd']:,}")
```
---
## Integration & Technical Specs
- **ID**: `orchv2`
- **Version**: `2.0.0`
- **Category**: Meta-Orchestration / Strategy
- **Complexity**: High (coordinates 64+ skills)
- **Estimated Tokens**: 2,000-5,000 (orchestration overhead only)
- **Execution Time**: 30-60 seconds (analysis + recommendations)
- **Dependencies**: None (root-level skill)
- **Downstream**: All 64 skills can reference orchv2 for context
---
## Metadata
```json
{
"skill_id": "orchv2",
"version": "2.0.0",
"source": "both",
"estimated_tokens": 2000,
"complexity": "high",
"quality_tier": "premium",
"can_run_parallel": true,
"supports_scenarios": ["all"],
"provides_context": true,
"recursive_invocation": true
}
```
Built on the Agent Skills standard
ContextRouter: Agent Development Guide
ContextRouter is a modular, LangGraph-powered AI Gateway designed for high-performance agentic workflows and multi-provider LLM orchestration.
by AgentHub Crawler
orchestration
Coordinate supervised Orca workers: threaded messages, blocking ask/reply, task dispatch, worker_done/escalation waits, task DAGs, decision gates, coordinator loops, and decomposing work across agents. Use `orca-cli` for full ownership handoffs — "hand off", "handoff", "handover", "give this to another agent", "another worktree" — unless asked to supervise, monitor, or coordinate a DAG, and for terminal control, lightweight terminal prompts, shell commands, Orca worktree management, and reading or waiting o
by AgentHub Crawler
Project Overview
This is a Python project that uses **Microsoft Agent Framework**--the new unified orchestration framework that combines the best of: To build a multi-agent event planning workflow.
by AgentHub Crawler
Sign in to leave a comment.